Wednesday, April 04, 2007
Clicks More Valuable Than Calls?
I recently started advertising on Superpages.com and was shocked to find that the company is charging more for its premium pay per click placement than for pay per call. I'm really having trouble understanding under what scenario a network might justifycharging more for a click than a call, and I'm coming up empty.
Superpages wants to charge $2.50 PER CLICK for ads that appear among the first 8 in a category. For the same placement, the company is charging $2 for calls made through a number that Superpages sets up for advertisers.
A call to a company is a commitment of time and shows a much higher level of interest than a click, which is often done to browse the competition and see if there is a match between supplier and consumer. If you are picking up the phone, the odds of making a purchase are a magnitude higher than a click.
$2.50 per click just seems outrageous for a small business to pay. We know what the click through rates are on ads, and the odds that a link to a company's website will lead to a conversion are very slim. Pay per call customers can't put their website link within their ad, but that is not enough of a detriment to push people to pay per click. What am I missing?
Posted By Jason Dowdell at 03:44 PM
Permanent Link: Clicks More Valuable Than Calls?
| Comments (1)
